Share this article:
Print

Key witness delivers bombshell in Morning Star Boys Ranch sex abuse trial

Click here for a free download of the latest Adobe Flash Player.

by KREM.com

krem.com

Posted on January 25, 2010 at 6:37 PM

Updated Monday, Jan 25 at 11:10 PM

SPOKANE -- A key witness lays a bombshell before the jury in the child sexual abuse civil trial against the Morning Star Boys Ranch.  The witness not only claims he was sexually abused at the ranch, but that the former director paid him $2,000 to keep the entire thing quiet.

Michael Clarke was the subject of heated argument in court Monday.  The Plaintiffs calls him the 'Rosetta Stone' of their case against Morning Star Ranch.  Both sides presented their cases.  Until recently, Clarke never told anyone about being a victim of abuse at Morning Star.  Back in 2006, he told Morning Star attorneys he was not a victim.  Today, he told a jury that was a lie.

The lawsuit involves Kenny Putnam, who says he was sexually abused three times during his stay at Morning Star Ranch in the mid 1980's.  In the late 1970's, Michael Clarke began a three year stay there.  He claims former director Father Joe Weitenseiner sexually abused him up to 20 times at the ranch, on his boat and on camping trips.  Decades later, he says Weitensteiner gave him a bribe as the ranch faced civil litigation.

Last week, Father Weitensteiner said he barely knew Clarke, never gave him money and certainly didn't abuse him.  On the stand, Clarke said the exact opposite.  Yet, Clarke called Weitensteiner a good man, a father who helped him survive his teens.  After his time at Morning Star, Clarke said Weitensteiner gave him money.  Then in 2006, there was the alleged hush money meeting.

"To the best of my recollection, well, the bottom line of it is I received an envelope with $2,000," said Clarke.

A few days later, Clarke met with Weitensteiner and a Morning Star attorney.  The ranch was facing other lawsuits.  Clarke denied any abuse, said he received $2,000, and quickly recanted.

Clarke has a long criminal history, and is serving a sentence at Airway Heights.  He presented his story without a jury.  It would be up to the judge to decide if it was fit for the trial.  In the end, Judge Kathleen O'Connor allowed Clarke's testimony.

The defense hinted it would ask for a mistrial because of the "media circus" his testimony has created.  The battle over character continues Tuesday.  The defense will call the former Morning Star attorney, who earlier today denied the hush money existed.

Share this article:
Print

To add a comment, please register or login.

Leave your comment
1000 characters remaining

Submit

We welcome your comments on this story's topic. Off-topic comments, personal attacks, and inappropriate language may be flagged and removed, and comment privileges blocked, per our Terms of Service. Thanks for keeping the comments space respectful.

Privacy Policy

HTML is not allowed.

You have indicated this comment should be removed.

Close

The comment has been submitted for review. Thank you .

Comments: Displaying 1 - 2 of 2

vegasman said on February 10, 2010 at 7:47 AM

The problem with lying is that you lose your credibility. Should I beleive you now when you say what you said earlier was a lie. How do I know that what you said earlier was the truth and what you are saying now is the lie? You see the problem here. If you tell me you are a liar I am not going to beleive anything you tell me since now I don't know what is truth and what is fiction.

37357453
Flag this comment

wagthedog said on January 25, 2010 at 8:45 PM

Have comments been turned off?

36360987
Flag this comment